In a paper published two months ago, the author presents a proposal for sanctions (refer to the end of this post) aimed at preventing or eliminating the occurrence of scientific misconduct acts. The problem in adopting such a radical and punitive strategy lies in the naïve assumption that imposing severe penalties alone can effectively address the issue of scientific misconduct.
This belief is misguided, as the deterrence hypothesis proves to be a fallacy, applicable not only to blood-related crimes but also to academic offenses. A more prudent approach for academia would be to reform the reward system, as recommended in a 2014 paper (refer to Table 2) by Stanford Professor John Ioannidis.